R v Holland
- Novus actus interveniens; causation; refused gangrene treatment
R v Holland (1841) is a general-principle English criminal law decision as to novus actus interveniens — breaking the chain of causation. It confirmed the rarity of scenarios that will break the chain when serious, intentional bodily harm is carried out.
Facts
The defendant (Holland) mugged Thomas Garland with a knife. During the incident, Garland's thumb was cut. Gangrene and tetanus set into that wound. Garland's doctor warned Garland that amputation was necessary. The victim refused medical treatment for the gangrene-infected wound initially. Garland later, after the thumb got worse, did get the thumb amputated, but it was too late and he died anyway of sepsis. Had Garland listened to advice sooner, he would likely have survived. Based on surviving descriptions of the wound, it is likely that amputation would have been necessary even with modern medical technology.
Holland was caught and placed on trial. Holland tried using, as a defense, that the victim would have survived with better treatment and thus murder was not an appropriate charge. Garland's doctor was even placed on the stand and testified that had Garland gotten his thumb amputated on time, Garland would still be alive. The defense, was, essentially, that infection killed the victim, not the mugger.
Decision
The court ruled that it did not matter whether or not the wound was instantly fatal, or the victim later died because the victim did not receive proper treatment. Instead, the court used the 'but for' test; 'but for the initial injury, would the victim have died?' The ruling was unanimous. Even though the victim broke the chain of causation, the defendant had started the chain and he was rightly in law convicted of murder.
Application
The decision was directly applied (followed) in R v Blaue.
External links
- Transcript of the judgement in BAILII
- v
- t
- e
- Indictable
- Either way
- Summary
- Regulatory (lowered mens rea)
- Statutory
- Common law
- Actus reus
- Causation
- Mens rea
- Intention (criminal law)
- Intention in English law
- Recklessness
- Criminal negligence
- Corporate / Vicarious / Strict liability
- Omissions
- Lesser included offences
- Concurrence
- Ignorantia juris non excusat
- Self-defence
- Duress
- Necessity
- Loss of control
- Consent
- inc. participation in a sporting event
- Medical procedures
- Prevention of crime
- Lawful excuse
- Insanity
- Diminished responsibility
- Intoxication
- Category:Criminal defences
the person
- Homicide (Murder / Manslaughter / Corporate manslaughter / Infanticide)
- Unlawful killing
- Child destruction
- Concealment of birth
- Wounding or causing grievous bodily harm
- Assault occasioning actual bodily harm
- Common assault
- Attempting to choke, &c. in order to commit any indictable offence
- Assault with intent to rob
- Robbery
- Assault with intent to rape
- Assault with intent to resist lawful apprehension
- Assaulting a constable in the execution of his duty
- Battery
- Kidnapping
- Child abduction
- False imprisonment
- Harassment
- Offences Against the Person Act 1861
- Treason
- Riot
- Violent disorder
- Affray
- Unlawful assembly
- Fear or provocation of violence
- Harassment, alarm or distress
- Public Order Act 1986
- Incitement to ethnic or racial hatred
- Nuisance
- Causing Public nuisance
- Outraging public decency
- Effecting a public mischief
- Keeping a disorderly house
- Preventing the lawful burial of a body
- Breach of the peace
- Rout
- Forcible entry
- Accessory (legal term)
- Misconduct in a public office
- Misfeasance in public office
- Abuse of authority
- Perjury of oath
- Dereliction of duty
- Arson
- Dishonesty
- Cheating (law)
- Burglary
- Robbery
- Theft
- Criminal damage
- Squatting
- Trespass
- Taking without owner's consent
- Deception
- Handling stolen goods
- Misappropriation of funds
- Blackmail
- Extortion
- Cybercrime
- Theft Act 1968
- Theft Act 1978
- Fraud Act 2006
- Fraud by abuse of position
- Conspiracy to defraud
- Fare evasion
- Webcam blackmail
and cheating
- Bribery
- Perjury
- Perverting the course of justice
- Witness intimidation
- Witness tampering
- Misprision of treason
- Jury tampering
- Assault with intent to resist lawful apprehension
- Assaulting a constable in the execution of his duty
- Harboring a fugitive
- Encouraging or assisting a crime
- Escape from lawful custody
- Obstruction of justice
- Obstruction of a police officer
- Wasting police time
- Refusing to assist a constable
- Sedition
- Espionage
- Contempt of court
- Fabrication of false evidence
- Rescuing a prisoner
- Contract
- Tort
- Property
- Wills
- Trusts and estates
- Evidence
- Criminal procedure
- English law portal
- For obsolete aspects see History of English criminal law table