R v Dytham

English criminal law case

R v Dytham [1979] Q.B. 722 is an English criminal law case dealing with liability for omissions. The court upheld the common law mantra that if there is a duty to act, then failure to do so is an offence.[1]

A police officer from St. Helens, witnessed the death of a nightclubber outside Cindy's nightclub but took no action to help because, had he reported it then Dytham would have had to stay beyond the end of his shift. The defendant was convicted of the common law offence of misconduct in a public office. The court rejected the defendant's contention that this offence required malfeasance, or at least misfeasance, and did not extend to non-feasance.

The court held that as a police officer, he had a duty of care to all of society, unlike civilians, in which case, there is no duty to put oneself at harm.

References

  1. ^ Halsbury's Laws of England, volume 25: "Circumstances", paragraph 6 (5th edition)
  • v
  • t
  • e
English criminal law
Classes of crimes
  • Indictable
  • Either way
  • Summary
  • Regulatory (lowered mens rea)
  • Statutory
  • Common law
Elements of crimes
DoctrinesInchoate offencesDefencesOffences against
the personSexual offencesPublic order offencesOffences against propertyForgery, personation
and cheatingOffences against justiceOther common law areas
  • English law portal
  • For obsolete aspects see History of English criminal law table
Flag of United KingdomJustice icon

This article relating to law in the United Kingdom, or its constituent jurisdictions, is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it.

  • v
  • t
  • e
Stub icon

This crime-related article is a stub. You can help Wikipedia by expanding it.

  • v
  • t
  • e